Soul Integration and Re-Creation

Karma free perfected health

Tainted Irish pork may have reached 25 nations

Sun Dec 7, 2008
 
1 of 1Full Size

By Laura MacInnis

GENEVA (Reuters) - Repairing the giant particle collider built to simulate the "Big Bang" could cost up to 35 million Swiss francs ($29 million), the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) said on Friday.

Announcing a further delay to the Large Hadron Collider's resumption, now expected in summer, CERN spokesman James Gillies said repairs will cost 15 million Swiss francs, and spare parts would cost another 10-20 million Swiss francs.

The massive collider, the largest and most complex machine ever made, has already cost 10 billion Swiss francs to build, supported by CERN's 20 European member states and other nations including the United States and Russia.

"We will not be going to our member states asking for more money, we will deal with it within the current CERN budget," Gillies said.

The collider was designed to recreate conditions just after the Big Bang, believed by most cosmologists to have created the universe 13.7 billion years ago.

It sends beams of sub-atomic particles to smash into each other at nearly the speed of light. Physicists plan to look at the results of those explosions for new or previously unseen particles that could unlock more secrets of science.

Scientists started it up with great fanfare in September, firing beams of proton particles around its 27-km (17-mile) underground tunnel. But nine days later they were forced to shut it down when an electrical fault caused a helium leak.

Gillies said that helium leak caused "quite considerable mechanical damage to the accelerator."

Repairing it will require 53 of the 57 magnets in the collider's tunnel, buried under the Swiss-French border near Geneva, to be removed and then re-installed.

Some 28 have already come out, and all the magnets should be back in place by the end of March, Gillies said. CERN now expects the machine to be powered up again for tests by June, after which particle beams can be sent around again.

"We don't have a precise date for it yet," the spokesman said. CERN had originally said the machine would be restarted in the spring.

(Editing by Stephanie Nebehay and Richard Balmforth) 

 

Updated Decemeber 5, 2008

Nano Superbug-Killers -Identifies Bacteria That Have Become Resistant to Antibiotics

The following blog post is from an independent writer and is not connected with Reuters News. The opinions and views expressed herein are those of the author and are not endorsed by Reuters.com. or The Energy Centre.
 

Captantlantis720033 Antibiotics are one of the greatest things ever discovered by humans. They've saved countless lives, they're the cornerstone of our modern "not dropping dead of minor infections" society, they were discovered by accident and they're not going to work forever. Sorry to end on a downer but this stuff is kind of important.


"Superbugs" aren't tiny S-logoed avengers out to save microbial innocents from bacterial Lex Luthors: they're disease-causing bacteria which have become resistant to our antibiotic countermeasures. This is an unavoidable effect of treating them - as drugs are used to kill the unwanted invaders they force a selection process which favors those resistant to the treatment, evolving strains which laugh in the face of medicine.

The only upside to this grim fact is that this is one of the few situations where you can talk about evolution without creationists getting in your face. Those who claim that a kind and loving God created all things exactly as they are tend to steer clear of discussions involving anthrax, leprosy and tuberculosis. Possibly because they'd have to redefine "kind and loving" quite a lot and the whole "it is sent as a test" spiel doesn't fly for a man coughing up his lungs while his face rots off.

Researchers at University College London have developed a tool which could help us stay ahead in the antibiotic arms race. A nanoscale springboard system has been designed to rapidly screen potential hunter-killer chemicals. The device consists of a sheet of silicon covered in tiny nanotech levers which reflect laser light. The other side of the lever is covered with mucopeptides taken from the surface of the target bacteria.

The drugs to be tested work by latching onto the bacteria and literally ripping its cell wall to pieces, exposing the vulnerable core to destruction by the surrounding environment. When a drug can latch onto the mucopeptide, it bends the cantilever and alters the reflection of the laser. The response to the drug can be observed almost instantly. While this technique only works for surface-latching antibiotics (by no means the only antibiotic mechanism), Professor McKendry and colleagues are already planning an upgrade where entire bacterial cells will be pinned to the nano-lever and stretched by drugs.

When a team is literally putting disease on the rack and getting all Inquisition on it, you know they're serious.

By Luke McKinney

Image credit: Ndieyira et al Nature Nanotechnology 2008

Superbug killers in the balance from New Scientist

Amazing Blog entry about Doctors

Re: Modern medicine: U.S. surgeons routinely operated on babies without anesthes

Hi Kibo,

here is a reliable source for an amazing healing method. I put few
pages here to start with:

http://www.enlightenmentpathsir.com/howandwhatsirheals.htm
http://www.enlightenmentpathsir.com/madcowandbirdflu.htm
http://www.enlightenmentpathsir.com/brainnervehealing.htm
http://www.enlightenmentpathsir.com/conceptcosmiccreation.htm
http://sophiaswisdom.weebly.com/ask-sophia.html

This healing method is not just alternative, it is integral and works
on the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual levels.

TAKE SOME TIME to read the sites. Purely interesting and full of deep
wisdom and light!

Namaste,
Arnaud



, "kibodabi"  wrote:
>
> Mahalo!
> More and more I see and hear horrible medical stories. I try to deal
> with alternative and preventive measures as much as possible. But
> even that is becoming beseiged by scam products trying to make a
> quick buck. Technologies such as the Rife machine need to be
> reintroduced in their original or perfected state. while I think
> that after stasis such will be available. I have a question.
> Is there a reliable internet source for alternative medicine? A hub
> site that would be able to responsibly inform people of available and
> valid ways to avoid the death and money traps of conventional medical
> control systems seems like a good idea. It is not my area of
> expertise, however, but it might make a good mission. Kind of like a
> consumers report of alternative health. Just throwing it out there
> for anyone that thinks they can tackle it.
> Thanks for reading...
> Love and Light to All
> kibo
>
 "dritaj"  wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for coming back brother Ron. I like and agree completely
> > with this article because I know more other stories. I have also a
> > terrible experience during removing my tonsiles without anastesia
> > when I was 5 years old. It is bad fact that most of the people
> still
> > beleives blindly on convetional medicine.I hope this will change
> > shortly by the success of alternative medicine.
> >
> > Love and light
> > Drita
> >
> >
 "nedkelly11" wrote:
> > >
> > > G'day cobbers,
> > >
> > > Mike Adams gives us some home truths about the darker side of
> modern
> > > conventional medicine. This article is a bit gruesome so don't
> read
> > > it if you are a bit squeamish or worried about maintaining your
> > positive
> > > vibes. However, it is truth telling so please don't suggest it has
> > > no place in our knowledge banks.
> > > Ron [:D]
> > > ********************
> > >
> > > The dark history of modern medicine: U.S. surgeons routinely
> > operated on
> > > babies without anesthesia
> > > Thursday, August 10, 2006 by: Mike Adams
> > > Key concepts: Surgeons, Conventional medicine and Modern medicine
> > >
> > > A warning to readers: this is a gruesome story. Do not read this
> if
> > you
> > > are squeamish. It's a hard-to-believe (but true) account of the
> > horrors
> > > of conventional medicine and its barbaric surgical procedures,
> many
> > of
> > > which are still practiced today.
> > >
> > > We begin by examining the astonishing practice of prestigious U.S.
> > > surgeons operating on babies with no anesthesia, subjecting them
> to
> > the
> > > intense pain and trauma of having their skin sliced open with
> > scalpels,
> > > their internal organs poked and prodded, and their surgical wounds
> > > closed up with staples and stitches... all with full awareness of
> > each
> > > terrifying moment of excruciating pain.
> > >
> > > To stop the babies from screaming in terror, surgeons gave them
> > heavy
> > > doses of muscle relaxants, paralyzing them for the duration of the
> > > procedure. And so these babies could only watch in terrified
> > amazement,
> > > prisoners in their own tiny bodies, unable to move a muscle or
> make
> > a
> > > sound, as strange men wearing masks and wielding sharp
> instruments
> > went
> > > to work on their flesh.
> > >
> > > If it sounds like a "mad doctor" horror film, think again: This
> was
> > a
> > > common practice by U.S. surgeons right up to the 1980's. Many
> adults
> > > living today were once subjected to the terror of full-
> consciousness
> > > surgical procedures as babies or infants, performed by the
> > brightest and
> > > most authoritative surgeons of the day -- the same kind of
> arrogant
> > > surgeons who now tell us that bariatric surgery is a treatment for
> > > obesity, or that surgically removing muscles of the skull is a
> cure
> > for
> > > migraines.
> > >
> > > Surgery has a dark and dreadful history in the Western world, and
> > the
> > > practice of operating on babies without anesthesia is just one
> > footnote
> > > in a saga too terrifying to accurately describe. Its real history
> is
> > > hardly ever talked about today, just as doctors don't readily
> admit
> > > their profession once hawked cigarettes on television, proudly
> > > proclaiming Camels were, "Recommended by more doctors than any
> other
> > > cigarette!"
> > >
> > > But the practice was real, and it was "standard operating
> > procedure" at
> > > places like Oxford University and Boston Children's Hospital. It
> > makes
> > > us all wonder, though... How could surgeons be so cruel as to
> > operate on
> > > babies without anesthesia?
> > >
> > > The bizarre beliefs of surgeons
> > > The answer, as strange as it now seems, is that they actually
> > believed
> > > babies couldn't feel pain. It's absurd, yes, but the mindset
> > continues
> > > today with medical experiments on animals, where researchers tell
> > > themselves these animals don't feel pain either.
> > >
> > > Much of conventional medicine has always been based on a lie, or a
> > > series of lies. Babies feel no pain. Lab rats feel no pain.
> Monkeys
> > are
> > > not conscious beings. Health knowledge is gained by dissecting
> > living
> > > beings and identifying their parts. Take your pick.
> > >
> > > It was once common knowledge in the field of medicine that female
> > > reproductive organs made women crazy. Hysterectomies, which are
> > still
> > > routinely performed today for no medically justifiable reason,
> > derive
> > > their very name from the intention of the surgery: Hyster =
> > hysteria,
> > > ectomy = to remove. Thus, hysterectomies were ordered and
> performed
> > on
> > > the simple basis of removing hysterical behavior in women.
> > >
> > > The procedure, of course, was almost always performed by men. It
> > was the
> > > women, you see, who were all insane, they claimed. The men were
> > merely
> > > scientists practicing what they called, "evidence-based
> medicine" --
> > a
> > > term you still hear thrown around today by doctors and surgeons
> > > defending modern medical scams.
> > >
> > > The madness of surgery continues into modern times
> > > The madness of conventional medicine and its surgical procedures,
> > sadly,
> > > is not yet a closed chapter in the history books. We're still
> > living it,
> > > and millions of Americans each year are being subjected to
> surgical
> > > procedures that can only be described as utterly mad, if not
> > downright
> > > profitable for the masked men performing them: Hysterectomies,
> > gastric
> > > bypass surgery, heart bypass surgery, carpal tunnel surgery, the
> > > surgical removal of wisdom teeth and many more.
> > >
> > > None of these have any medical justification except in a few
> extreme
> > > cases. Nearly all are conducted for the sole purpose of generating
> > > business for surgeons who suffer serious delusions about the
> > efficacy of
> > > these procedures, just as the surgeons of three decades ago once
> > > believed babies could feel no pain.
> > >
> > > There's not a conventional dentist who has looked in my mouth, for
> > > example, who didn't immediately urge me to undergo oral surgery to
> > > remove my wisdom teeth. I'm 36 years old. My teeth are fine. My
> jaw
> > is
> > > fine. But my dentists are mad. Most patients would automatically
> > say yes
> > > to such an authoritative suggestion, though. They'd agree on the
> > spot:
> > > "Yes, I'll let you cut open my jaw and remove my teeth just
> because
> > you
> > > say so!"
> > >
> > > Two decades ago it was tonsils. Half the children I grew up with,
> it
> > > seemed, had their tonsils surgically removed. That particular
> > procedure
> > > was a popular medical fad. Countless parents were hoodwinked into
> > > letting little Johnny go under the knife. But after hundreds of
> > > thousands of such procedures were performed, it eventually became
> > > obvious that removing the tonsils did nothing beneficial other
> than
> > pad
> > > the pockets and egos of doctors. Today, it is rarely done at all.
> > > Tonsils get infected. It doesn't mean you should slice them out.
> > >
> > > Besides, we have new surgical fads now like bariatric surgery -- a
> > > lobotomy of the stomach -- where surgeons maim patients for life
> and
> > > then send a bill to the ones who don't die on the operating table.
> > > Actually, they get billed, too. Surgery ain't free, you know,
> even
> > if
> > > you're dead.
> > >
> > > Nearly five percent of such patients are, in fact, dead in the
> first
> > > year following the bariatric surgery, studies now show. And many
> > more
> > > who survive the ordeal find that they overproduce insulin after
> > > ingesting food -- a condition known as hyperinsulinemia. It's
> > sometimes
> > > also called "islet cell hyperfunction," and it means the pancreas
> is
> > > producing too much insulin in response to food intake. You know
> > what the
> > > surgeon's modern solution to this problem is?
> > >
> > > They open up the patient and slice off part of the pancreas!
> > Amazing,
> > > huh? That way, it won't produce so much insulin. It makes you
> wonder
> > > what the surgical cure for headaches might be.
> > >
> > > With similar insanity, the modern treatment for an overactive
> > thyroid is
> > > to fry it with radiation so powerful that people who undergo the
> > > procedure are now setting off nuclear materials detection scans at
> > > airports. Patients who receive the radioactive iodine injections
> > used in
> > > the procedure are advised -- get this -- to avoid hanging around
> > their
> > > pets because they're so radioactive, they might give the family
> dog
> > > cancer!
> > >
> > > I swear, I'm not making this up.
> > >
> > > Surgical treatments for mental health
> > > If you think it's all a bit mad, you're right. But you don't know
> > the
> > > half of it. Mental health, you see, has also been treated by
> > barbaric
> > > surgical procedures. Turn the clock back on conventional medicine
> > to the
> > > early 1900's when a psychiatrist named Henry Cotton was the
> medical
> > > director at the New Jersey State Hospital at Trenton.
> > >
> > > Dr. Cotton cooked up the theory that mental illness was the
> result
> > of
> > > bacterial infections and pus found throughout the body. With the
> > full
> > > support of the medical authorities of the day, he and his staff
> > > proceeded to surgically remove practically every organ and
> > structure in
> > > the patient's body in an effort to cure them of their "illness."
> > >
> > > He would often start with the teeth, pulling them out one by one.
> If
> > > that didn't "cure" the patient, he would cut out their tonsils and
> > > sinuses. When that didn't cure them either, he'd move on to other
> > > organs: gall bladders, stomachs, spleens, ovaries, testicles and
> > even
> > > their colons. Patients who weren't healed by this "treatment" were
> > > subjected to even more organ removals, to the point where some
> > patients
> > > were maimed beyond recognition and were barely alive at all.
> > >
> > > It wasn't all voluntary, either. Some patients were literally
> > dragged
> > > kicking and screaming into the procedures, then violently
> strapped
> > onto
> > > surgical tables so that the "treatment" could begin. Others
> actually
> > > paid big bucks for the treatment, as you'll see below.
> > >
> > > Dr. Cotton publicly announced a cure rate of 85 percent. That
> > number, he
> > > later admitted, included those who died from the treatment,
> because
> > they
> > > were "no longer suffering" from the illness. (Sounds a lot like
> > today's
> > > chemotherapy treatments for cancer, doesn't it?) Conventional
> > medicine
> > > has a long history of fudging the numbers, it seems. You can
> > announce
> > > whatever success rate you want if you redefine success. (Modern
> > medicine
> > > has done that quite effectively with drug trials.) The actual
> death
> > rate
> > > from Dr. Cotton's treatments, by the way, was 30 percent of all
> > > patients.
> > >
> > > A pioneer of conventional medicine
> > > Not surprisingly, conventional medicine gleefully embraced
> Cotton's
> > > work, heaping unprecedented praise upon his "genius" discoveries
> > about
> > > the true cause of mental illness. He was honored at medical
> > institutions
> > > across the U.S. and Europe, and invited to speak to elite groups
> of
> > > leading doctors and surgeons. He was widely considered one of the
> > > pioneers in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health
> disorders.
> > > (Today, by the way, the theory of mental disorders has shifted
> > from "pus
> > > in the organs" to "chemical imbalances in the brain" which are
> > treated
> > > by toxic synthetic chemicals known as prescription drugs.
> Different
> > era,
> > > different terminology. Same con.)
> > >
> > > As demand for his treatments skyrocketed, in part due to a series
> of
> > > glowing news reports published in the New York Times, Cotton saw
> > visions
> > > of dollar signs like any good psychiatrist. He opened a private
> > clinic
> > > for treating mental illness, where he raked in enormous sums for
> > > removing the teeth and organs of the super rich. Rich people,
> even
> > in
> > > 1922, were just as gullible as rich people today when it comes to
> > > trading their wealth for medical procedures based on junk science.
> > >
> > > Despite the astonishing death rate, patients couldn't get enough
> of
> > > Cotton's cutting-edge treatments, and they were willing to fork
> > over top
> > > dollar to subject themselves to various organ lobotomies in the
> > hopes of
> > > curing mental illness that was most likely caused by simple
> > nutritional
> > > deficiencies. (It's much like today, where cancer patients are
> > tripping
> > > over each other to sign up for the latest, greatest, over-hyped
> > > anti-cancer drug, no matter what the cost, when most cancers are
> > easily
> > > treated with low-cost herbs and nutritional therapies.)
> > >
> > > When Dr. Cotton fell ill himself, he had his own teeth surgically
> > > removed and promptly returned to work, performing the same
> > procedure on
> > > others. He did not, however, remove his own testicles.
> (Apparently,
> > he
> > > didn't have the balls.)
> > >
> > > A champion of conventional medicine
> > > But this is no laughing matter. What's important to note about
> Dr.
> > Henry
> > > Cotton was not the barbaric nature of his surgical treatments,
> nor
> > the
> > > madness of his ideas, but rather the stunning fact that he was
> > widely
> > > considered a pioneer by the medical authorities of his time.
> > Cotton, for
> > > example, was considered a top student at the John Hopkins School
> of
> > > Medicine, and the psychiatric industry openly accepted Dr.
> Cotton's
> > > insane methods. Even to this day, the American Journal of
> Psychiatry
> > > offers this glowing whitewash of Dr. Cotton on its web page about
> > the
> > > history of the Trenton Psychiatric Hospital: "In 1907 Dr. Henry A.
> > > Cotton became the medical director, and a new era in the
> treatment
> > of
> > > mental diseases began. Among other improvements, Dr. Cotton is
> > credited
> > > with abolishing all forms of mechanical restraints and
> implementing
> > > daily staff meetings to discuss patient care."
> > >
> > > Mysteriously, there is no mention in the journal of Dr. Cotton's
> > > barbaric methods of treatment other than calling them, "...a new
> > era in
> > > the treatment of mental diseases." The American Journal of
> > Psychiatry
> > > focuses instead on Dr. Cotton's exciting invention of "daily staff
> > > meetings." Wow. That's amazing stuff. Meetings? Really?
> > >
> > > Prestigious medical institutions around the world were suckered
> in,
> > too.
> > > They lined up to invite Dr. Cotton to speak at their schools.
> Even
> > the
> > > New York Times wrote glowing accounts of Dr. Cotton's "scientific
> > > discoveries."
> > >
> > > All the brightest doctors in the world, it seems, couldn't tell
> the
> > > difference between treatment and torture.
> > >
> > > Modern surgery is still half mad
> > > And many still can't today. Because the history of surgery in
> > > conventional medicine continues right up to this day, where
> > countless
> > > barbaric procedures are still being formed, all in the name of
> > > "treating" patients. Babies are now receiving anesthesia when
> > operated
> > > on, thankfully, but 50,000 Americans this year will have their
> > digestive
> > > tracts partially ripped out in a procedure marketed to them by
> > surgeons
> > > hawking the latest weight loss "cure" who just happen to avoid
> > > mentioning all the sexy side effects of the procedure (like
> having
> > to
> > > drink all your food through a straw for the rest of your life, or
> > puking
> > > every time you swallow any chunk of food larger than a tater tot).
> > >
> > > The fad procedures always change, you see, but the cons don't.
> > Today,
> > > just as a hundred years ago, the public and the press remain
> > hoodwinked
> > > by the false authority and high-IQ language of surgeons pushing
> the
> > > latest surgical fads... all based on the latest and
> > greatest "scientific
> > > knowledge" of the day (which will be considered nonsense in about
> > twenty
> > > years).
> > >
> > > But it doesn't matter how much technical knowledge they learn,
> nor
> > the
> > > sophistication of their high-tech instruments, nor whether they
> can
> > > perform remote surgery over the internet with a robot-controlled
> > arm. It
> > > sounds cool, but it's really just stupid. Cutting into the human
> > body is
> > > plainly traumatic and harmful by its very nature, and it should
> > only be
> > > used as a last resort when other treatments are not available.
> > >
> > > Just to clarify, we do need great surgeons to save the lives of
> > those
> > > suffering from trauma, accidents or physical birth defects. Some
> > people
> > > genuinely benefit from cosmetic surgery, and I'm not just talking
> > about
> > > silicone implants. Some dental patients really do benefit from
> oral
> > > surgery when things have deteriorated too far. There are many
> other
> > > examples where surgery has a legitimate purpose.
> > >
> > > We need these technicians in society for many things, but not for
> > half
> > > the things they impose upon us. Much of the surgery being done
> > today is
> > > a sham, and not coincidentally, it just happens to be a sham that
> > keeps
> > > surgeons well paid, just like it has for over a hundred years.
> > >
> > > Dr. Cotton would have been proud to see modern medicine carrying
> on
> > his
> > > trademark insanity today. I can see him smiling right now, with no
> > > teeth.

Updated November 17, 2008

New Report on Nano-Tech in food and products

By Michael Kahn

LONDON (Reuters) - More testing and regulation of nanomaterials used in an increasingly number of everyday products is urgently needed, experts said on Wednesday.

"...having analyzed the potential health and environmental impacts which flow from the properties of nanomaterials, we concluded that there is a plausible case for concern about some (but not all) classes of nanomaterials," the Royal Commission experts from the scientific, legal, business and medical communities wrote in a British government-funded report.

In particular the report cited tiny soccer-ball shaped carbon molecules called buckyballs that may have potential uses ranging from novel drug-delivery system to fuel cells, as well as carbon nanotubes and nanosilver.

Recent studies have found buckyballs -- short for buckministerfullerenes -- may threaten health by building up fat and have linked carbon nanotubes to potential lung cancer risk.

"We are very conscious of the extent to which knowledge about the potential health and environmental impacts of nanomaterials lags significantly behind the pace of innovation, although this could change as new scientific information arises," the study said.

Nanotechnology, the design and manipulation of materials thousands of times smaller than the width of a human hair, has been hailed as a way to make strong, lightweight materials, better cosmetics and even tastier food.

Major corporations and start-ups across almost every industry invest in nanotechnology, which found its way into $147 billion worth of products in 2007, according to Lux Research.

But scientists are only just starting to look at the impact such tiny objects might have, and the British report warned existing regulations may not be able to keep up with technology.

"We are also concerned that more sophisticated later generation nanoproducts will raise issues which cannot be dealt with by treating them as chemicals or mixtures of chemicals," John Lawton, an ecologist, who chaired the report, said in a statement.

The report, to which the government must reply, also determined that there were not grounds for a blanket ban or moratorium on nanomaterials.

Specifically, it also called on the government to recognize a "degree of ignorance and uncertainty in this area" and lay out the time it will take to address these.

In food itself, in food packages, in clothing, in sheets and towels, in storage containers, in beauty products, cleansing products it is in 45% of all products have some form of Nao technology in them!!

Blending Traditional and non-Traditional Medicines

Great News!

BEIJING (Reuters) - Health representatives from more than 70 countries gathered in Beijing on Friday to swap ideas on how to make traditional medicine, ranging from acupuncture to leech treatment, more widely available.

The two-day World Health Organization (WHO) event, built around seminars on regulatory standards and folk medicine in cultures from South Africa to Japan, is expected to end with member countries agreeing to expand traditional medicine in their health care systems.

WHO officials at the event said blending traditional and Western medicine could make each more effective.

"Integration of traditional medicine into national health systems will not only bring benefits to patients, but will also ensure safety and proper use," assistant WHO director-general Carissa Etienne told reporters at a briefing.

Speakers also called for research on traditional medicines, which WHO director-general Margaret Chan called "a valuable source of leads for therapeutic advances and the discovery of new classes of drugs."

Herbal and other treatments have sometimes been found effective in studies. Artemisinin, a plant ingredient used in southern China for centuries to fight malaria, became regarded as the best treatment for the disease after research proved its ability to clear parasites quickly.

Traditional medicine is used throughout China and in other developing countries, even with access to Western-style health care growing.

Leech therapy is used in parts of India to treat pain and skin diseases, and hospitals in China often offer both Western treatment and traditional cures like acupuncture or herbal antidotes.

In Canada and Germany, according to the WHO, more than seven in ten people have tried folk treatments as alternatives or supplements to modern health care.

Revenue from traditional medicine in Europe reached more than 3 billion euros ($3.82 billion) from 2003 to 2004, according to Zhang Xiaorui, WHO coordinator on traditional medicine. The number for China was $8 billion, she said.

"There are many examples where fast and effective traditional medicines have existed," said Hans Hogerzeil, the WHO's director of medicines policy and standards.

"They have then afterwards become more or less Western medicines because the active ingredient has been identified and is now produced in a standardized way."

($1=.7864 Euro)

(Reporting by Beijing newsroom; Editing by Paul Tait)

Genetic then Cloned now Nano foods!!

By Barbara Liston

July 30, 2008

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - Those consumers already worried about genetically engineered or cloned food reaching their tables may soon find something else in their grocery carts to furrow their brows over -- nano-foods.

Consumer advocates taking part in a food safety conference in Orlando, Florida, this week said food produced by using nanotechnology is quietly coming onto the market, and they want U.S. authorities to force manufacturers to identify them.

Nanotechnology involves the design and manipulation of materials on molecular scales, smaller than the width of a human hair and invisible to the naked eye. Companies using nanotechnology say it can enhance the flavor or nutritional effectiveness of food.

U.S. health officials generally prefer not to place warning labels on products unless there are clear reasons for caution or concern. But consumer advocates say uncertainty over health consequences alone is sufficient cause to justify identifying nano-foods.

"I think nanotechnology is the new genetic engineering. People just don't know what's going on, and it's moving so fast," Jane Kolodinsky, a consumer economist at the University of Vermont, said at the conference.

American consumers are generally more complacent about genetically modified or cloned foods than their counterparts in Europe.

But Michael Hansen, a senior scientist with the Consumers Union, said polls show that 69 percent of Americans are concerned about eating cloned meat.

He said that in focus groups run by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, no parents were willing to feed their children meat from cloned animals or their offspring.

In a recent CBS/New York Times poll, 53 percent of Americans said they wouldn't buy genetically modified foods.

SCANT AWARENESS

Hansen said there is scant public awareness, however, about foods produced through nanotechnology.

New consumer products created through nanotechnology are coming on the market at the rate of 3 to 4 per week, according to an advocacy group, The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN), based on an inventory it has drawn up of 609 known or claimed nano-products.

Nano-products in common use today include lightweight tennis rackets and bicycles, and sunscreens containing clear, nonwhite versions of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.

They also include lipsticks, and many items labeled as anti-microbial that contain silver ions such as socks, washing machines, salad spinners and food containers.

On PEN's list are three foods -- a brand of canola cooking oil called Canola Active Oil, a tea called Nanotea and a chocolate diet shake called Nanoceuticals Slim Shake Chocolate.

According to company information posted on PEN's Web site, the canola oil, by Shemen Industries of Israel, contains an additive called "nanodrops" designed to carry vitamins, minerals and phytochemicals through the digestive system.

The shake, according to U.S. manufacturer RBC Life Sciences Inc., uses cocoa infused "NanoClusters" to enhance the taste and health benefits of cocoa without the need for extra sugar.

The tea, says manufacturer Shenzhen Become Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. of China, is prepared with nanotechnology to "release effectively all of the excellent essences of the tea" and increase by a factor of 10 "the selenium supplement function."

Hansen, whose organization publishes the nonprofit product-testing magazine Consumer Reports, said there is no requirement that nano-products be identified as such.

He called for stronger federal regulations to require safety testing and labeling.

"Just because something is safe at the macro level, doesn't mean it's safe at the nano size," Hansen said. "All scientists agree that size matters."

Hansen said recent studies have shown that nano-sized particles in some cases can invade cells and breach the blood-brain barrier, and that some forms of nano-sized carbon could be as harmful as asbestos if inhaled in quantity.

"This represents science at the cutting edge. These technologies raise basic scientific issues," Hansen said.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New government estimates show that nearly 24 million people in the United States have diabetes, an increase of more than 3 million in two years.

This means that nearly 8 percent of the U.S. population has diabetes, mostly the type-2 diabetes linked with obesity, poor diet and a lack of exercise, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Tuesday.

The estimates, based on 2007 data, also show that 57 million people have pre-diabetes, a condition that puts people at increased risk for diabetes. And up to 25 percent of people with diabetes do not know they have it, the CDC said -- down from 30 percent two years ago.

Almost 25 percent of the population 60 years and older had diabetes in 2007, the CDC found.

The highest rates are among Native Americans and Alaska Natives, with 16.5 percent affected.

Close to 12 percent of blacks and 10 percent of Hispanics have diabetes, but just 7.5 percent of Asian Americans and 6.6 percent of whites.

Diabetes causes the body to produce less insulin, or to use it less effectively, which in turn causes blood sugar levels to rise. This in turn damages blood vessels and organs, leading to blindness, kidney disease, limb loss and heart disease.

It is the seventh-leading cause of death in the United States.

"It is concerning to know that we have more people developing diabetes, and these data are a reminder of the importance of increasing awareness of this condition, especially among people who are at high risk," said Dr. Ann Albright, director of the CDC's Division of Diabetes Translation.

"On the other hand, it is good to see that more people are aware that they have diabetes. That is an indication that our efforts to increase awareness are working, and more importantly, that more people are better prepared to manage this disease and its complications." (Reporting by Maggie Fox; Editing by Julie Steenhuysen)

Skin fibers connected to genetic foods

GM “Food” linked to the nightmare condition called Morgellon’s Disease

http://morgellonsusa.com/images/al21.jpg

Nightmare on Elm Street’s Dinner Table. Thank you, Monsanto!

Have you heard of the nightmare condition called Morgellon’s Disease (http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?p=599)?

Victims experience unbearable sensations - all the time, day and night - of insects crawling under their skin, burning and itching so terrible that people have committed suicide to end the torture. To make matters worse, much, much worse, these unfortunate people, who range in age from babies to the elderly, have open lesions on their skin that produces sharp, thin red, black, blue and white fibers and black sand-like grains. The fibers appear to move as if alive and, incredibly, when placed in a Petri dish after removal, continue to move and grow!

The origin of this horror has been unclear since it was first named in 2001 by the mother of a 3 year old baby whose symptoms she described and documented on a website. Since that time, thousands of people have been identified with this condition for which the only successful cure has been that most potent (and safe) of all antibiotics, nano silver. But the nature of the condition, and its cause, have remained a mystery until now.

This Plague Brought To You By BioTech

When fibers from Morgellon’s Disease lesions from numerous patients were analyzed by competent scientists, they were found to contain DNA from BOTH a fungus and a bacterium used in the production of commercial Genetically Modified plants and animals! Merging organisms that have totally separate DNA and characteristics for the sake of profit, regardless of the health or other consequences, the line between animate and inanimate has been crossed.

Stop playing God!



While man plays God and changes Human genomes
 and DNA by Genetic foods, cloned foods and chemicals
by chem-trails we here at "The Energy Centre" have
 discovered in 5 years and 3200 cases later the natural
 way to everlasting life in perfect health. Remove
 karma activate all junk DNA and genes into the
millions and then we are permitted by God to turn
off the death and aging gene. My body is 100%
organic matrix made to live off the earth not
manipulated by altered genes in my food, air,
water and soil. 50,000 years later our soil will
still not return to normal...............I am 53
years young and look 29 years old - Sophia


Geneticists Discover a Way to Extend Lifespans
to 800 Years

2008 01 19
There is now a way to extend the lifespan of
organisms so that humans could conceivably
live to be 800 years old. In an amazing development
, scientists at the University of Southern California
have announced that they've extended the lifespan
of yeast bacteria tenfold -- and the recipe they
used to do it might easily translate into humans.
 It involves ...
U.S. company claims it cloned humans
2008 01 19
A California company said on Thursday
 it used cloning technology to make
 five human embryos, with the eventual hope of
making matched stem cells for patients. Stemagen
Corp. in La Jolla, California, destroyed the embryos
 while testing to make sure they were true clones.
But the researchers, based at a fertility centre,
said they believed their ready source of new human ...

200 chemicals found in new borns

200 Chemicals Found In Newborns. Could Toxins Be A Cause Of Increased Birth Defects, Especially In Pre-Term Babies?

POSTED: Friday, May 23, 2008
 Whole Food And More - Being healthy doesn't have to be radical.Think little things done every day. We all have vices because we're human. Damage control for our unhealthy habits, like bad eating, can help us regain health.
 
The following blog post is from an independent writer and is not connected with Reuters News. The opinions and views expressed herein are those of the author and are not endorsed by Reuters.com.
 

This post addresses three growing concerns; infant birth defects, premature births and chemicals found in newborns. We'll start with the latest report that shows premature babies born in the United States are more than twice as likely to have a major birth defect than full-term infants.

The researchers tracked nearly 7 million babies born between 1995 and 2000 in 13 states, accounting for about 30 percent of U.S. births, to better understand the relationship between birth defects and pre-term birth.

About 8 percent of babies born prematurely had a birth defect, compared to roughly 3 percent for full-term births, according to the researchers. The number jumped to 16percent of the very pre-term babies -- those born between 24 and 31 weeks gestation.

Researchers state that pre-term birth affects about 12 percent of infants born in the United States. And birth defects affect about 3 percent of births in the U.S. And we think it's important to recognize the pretty strong association between these two serious outcomes.

The March of Dimes advocacy group said the percentage of U.S. babies born pre-term has been rising since 1981. Full article on Reuters

I recently wrote this article about birth defects in infants. In 2004 three to five percent of all U.S. babies were born with birth defects according to CDC. That's one in every thirty three baby having a birth defect.

A closer look at the root cause of birth defects reveals the potential for a nutritional or toxic origin as the leading suspects.

Consider the fact that scientists have found newborns contaminated with over 200 chemicals or pollutants through the study of umbilical cord blood randomly selected from hospitals in 2004. The chemicals found in the cord blood included 187 that are known carcinogens, 217 are known neurotoxins and 208 are known to cause birth defects.


I wonder how many Moms-to-be are aware of this study on vitamins:

The New England Journal of Medicine reported in 1995:
22,000 pregnant women were given synthetic Vitamin A. The study was halted because birth defects increased 400%. - New England Journal of Medicine, 1995.


Most prenatal vitamins are made using synthetic ingredients which have shown to cause harm to a developing fetus (above study.) When these synthetic ingredients are taken the growing baby is being exposed to artificial substances before he/she takes the first breath of fresh air.

Along with synthetic ingredients many prenatal vitamins have artificial food coloring: FD&C Yellow #6 Lake. Artificial food and supplement colorings are made of coal tar and petrochemicals. (Artificial food coloring is known to be toxic and detrimental to children, among others.) See here for references .

Is this healthy for mom or baby?

Most doctors suggest pregnant Moms to take a prenatal vitamin - look at what goes into the vitamins. Could this be factor in pre-term births and infant birth defects increase?

The FDA has recommendations for women of child bearing age relative to consuming vitamin A, including dietary supplements.

"The problem comes from pre-formed Vitamin A and synthetic* forms of beta-carotene. (Examples of pre-formed vitamin A include retinyl palmitateretinyl acetate)

On the other hand, beta-carotene is a substance found naturally in plants, and it can be converted to vitamin A in the body. It is considerably less toxic than the pre-formed vitamin A.

The vitamin A in fruits and vegetables is naturally in the form of beta-carotene, and high intakes of vitamin A from these sources is generally not of concern." *Vitamins with beta-carotene listed without the food source is lab/man created synthetic Vitamin A.

If you are concerned about your prenatal multi vitamin and the health of you and your unborn child read this article about safety of prenatal vitamins for helpful information. Also get this free report Are Your Vitamins Safe? to compare vitamin ingredients. If your vitamin is synthetic or has food coloring added and this matters to you, find something safer - look for a whole food multivitamin. Find them at Whole Foods stores and health food stores or try ours for free.

Amazing Health News
collected by "The Energy Centre"
updated weekly



Topics and subjects
updated June 9, 2008
Many NEW ones!

Food passes resistant bacteria on to consumers

MILAN (Reuters) - The use of antibiotics and other anti-microbial agents throughout the food chain contributes to the growth of resistant bacteria which can be passed on to humans through food, EU's food agency said on Thursday.

The resistance of bacteria has become a growing concern as anti-microbials become less effective in fighting infections, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) said in a statement.

This has coincided with a rise in bacterial resistance to anti-microbial agents in animals, the EFSA said, citing a draft opinion paper by one of its expert panels which was looking into causes of the growing and diverse range of resistant bacteria and bacteria-borne resistant genes.

The EFSA said hygiene controls should be tightened at every stage of the food chain, from veterinary medicine to food processing and preparation, to prevent the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance.

The main foods carrying antimicrobial resistant bacteria were poultry meat, eggs, pork or beef as well as fresh salads, which can be contaminated during preparation, handling and processing, it said.

The panel found bacteria could be passed directly to people from contaminated food of animal origin carrying resistant bacteria which could colonize or infect people after ingestion.

Bacteria could also be passed to humans by the consumption of fresh produce from land irrigated with water contaminated by slurry or sewage. Food of animal and non-animal origin could also be contaminated during handling and preparation.

The Parma-based EFSA has called for more scientific information on the link between the use of anti-microbial agents in the food chain and transmission of the resistant bacteria to humans and runs consultations on the draft opinion until May 27.

Asian mushroom cures breast cancer

LONDON (Reuters) - Extracts from a mushroom used for centuries in Eastern Asian medicine may stop breast cancer cells from growing and could become a new weapon in the fight against the killer disease, scientists said on Tuesday.

Laboratory tests using human breast cancer cells show the mushroom called Phellinus linteus has a marked anti-cancer effect, probably by blocking an enzyme called AKT. AKT is known to control signals that lead to cell growth.

Phellinus linteus -- called song gen in Chinese medicine, sang-hwang in Korean and meshimakobu in Japanese -- has previously been shown to have anti-tumor properties on skin, lung and prostate cancer cells.

The new research on breast cancer, however, marks the first time that scientists have started to understand how it works.

Dr Daniel Sliva of the Methodist Research Institute in Indianapolis said the mushroom extract reduced uncontrolled growth of new cancer cells, suppressed their aggressive behavior and blocked new tumor-feeding blood vessels.

"We're not yet able to apply this knowledge to modern medicine, but we ... hope our study will encourage more researchers to explore the use of medicinal mushrooms for the treatment of cancer," he said.

The findings were reported in the British Journal of Cancer.

In 2006 905,000 US kids maltreated

By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - About one of every 43 U.S. infants is physically abused or neglected annually, and those babies are especially at risk in the first week of their lives, U.S. health officials said on Thursday.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in its first report on maltreatment of babies up to age 1 that 91,278 of them were physically abused or neglected in 2006.

Other new government figures showed that 499 babies up to age 1 were killed in maltreatment cases in 2006.

About a third of the maltreated infants -- 29,881 -- were abused or neglected before they were 1 week old, mostly during their first four days, the CDC said. Many of those cases may be linked to maternal drug use, the CDC said.

Physical abuse included beating, kicking, biting, burning and shaking, and neglect included abandonment, maternal drug use or failing to meet basic needs like housing, food, clothing and access to medical care, according to the report.

The findings were particularly troubling because children who suffer such abuse tend to go on to have numerous health and other problems, officials said.

"The findings do demonstrate a clear pattern of early neglect and physical abuse that is largely preventable," Ileana Arias, who heads injury prevention efforts at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told reporters.

Based on data from child protection agencies in 45 states, the report found that more than 2.3 percent of infants up to age 1 suffered substantiated nonfatal maltreatment in fiscal 2006, which ran from October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006.

"Unfortunately, the report didn't surprise me," Jim Hmurovich, who heads the Chicago-based advocacy group Prevent Child Abuse America, said in a telephone interview.

"When a child is born, no matter how well the parent has been prepared for the coming of the child, it's a very stressful time. We know that the younger a child is, the higher the rate of victimization," Hmurovich added.

Most cases of maltreatment in the first week were reported by medical personnel, the CDC said. Thirteen percent of those week-old babies had been subjected to physical abuse.

"One hypothesis for the concentration of maltreatment and neglect reports in the first few days of life is that the majority of reports resulted from maternal or newborn drug tests," the CDC report said.

The report said 905,000 U.S. children of all ages were victims of maltreatment in 2006. Maltreatment is the third leading cause of death of U.S. children under 3, Arias said.

CDC epidemiologist Rebecca Leeb said most similar previous research focused on children from birth to age 3. Because this is the first data looking at babies up to age 1, it is unclear whether the problem is increasing or decreasing, Leeb said.

"We looked at some rates in Canada and it looks like the rates are fairly similar to what they're seeing. But we have no idea what the trends are at this time," Leeb added.

Slightly more boys than girls were victims. The CDC report did not provide rates among racial or ethnic groups.

(Editing by Peter Cooney)

Dogs get bird flu from birds!

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Dogs can catch influenza directly from birds, Korean researchers said on Wednesday, saying their finding shows pets could play a role in future pandemics.

Several pet dogs became ill and died from what turned out to be purely avian strains of seasonal flu virus, the researchers reported in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.

"Our data provide evidence that dogs may play a role in interspecies transmission and spread of influenza virus," Daesub Song of Green Cross Veterinary Products Company Ltd in Yong-in, South Korea and colleagues reported.

The dogs had H3N2 influenza -- a strain similar to one of the flu strains now circulating among humans. But genetic analysis showed the dogs were infected with viruses directly from birds, Song's team said.

Doctors know animals pass flu viruses to one another. Many experts believe most, if not all, influenza viruses originate among birds.

The H5N1 avian influenza virus, which is sweeping through flocks in Asia, Africa and parts of Europe, has occasionally passed to humans, infecting 376 people and killing 238 of them. It has also occasionally infected dogs, cats, clouded leopards, civets and dozens of bird species, from swans to coots.

The fear is that it will somehow change or combine into a form that is easily passed from one human to another, sparking a pandemic that would have the potential to kill hundreds of millions of people globally.

H3N2 is found in birds and is also a very common human flu strain. But the varieties that infect birds and people look different on the genetic level.

Song's team investigated outbreaks among dogs.

"From May through September 2007, cases of severe respiratory disease occurred in animals at three veterinary clinics located 10 to 30 km (6 to 18 miles) apart in Kyunggi Province and one kennel located in Jeolla Province (southern South Korea)," they wrote.

A miniature schnauzer recovered, but a cocker spaniel, two Korean Jindo dogs and a Yorkshire terrier died.

Another 13 dogs in a shelter were affected, and there is evidence some dogs infected others.

DNA analysis showed the viruses from the dogs closely resembled those from Chinese chickens or ducks in Hong Kong, Japan and China.

"Transmission of avian influenza A virus to a new mammalian species is of great concern because it potentially allows the virus to adapt to a new mammalian host, cross new species barriers and acquire pandemic potential," they wrote.

They believe the dogs were infected via food.

"We posit that this transmission results from feeding dogs untreated minced meats of ducks or chickens," they wrote.

"In South Korea, untreated duck and chicken meats, including internal organs and heads, have been widely used to feed dogs for fattening in local canine farms or kennels."

It is possible some of the dogs were infected via respiratory secretions in live bird markets, and passed the virus to others, they added.

"Live-bird markets are thought to constitute a missing link in the epidemiology of avian influenza viruses because they bring together numerous hosts, such as chickens, ducks, turkeys, geese and doves, in a high-density setting, which represents an ideal environment for virus interspecies transmission," they wrote.

(Reporting by Maggie Fox, editing by Will Dunham and Todd Eastham)

labeling cloned foods in the Market place

States Move to Label Cloned Food
After the FDA refused to require labels for cloned food, some state legislatures are drafting laws to respond to consumers’ demands

by Pallavi Gogoi

The debate over cloned food in the past year has been ferocious. As the Food & Drug Administration weighed whether to allow food from cloned animals into the country’s food supply, more than 30,000 public comments flooded in, with the overwhelming majority opposed to the move. Lea Askren, one consumer who wrote to the agency, called the practice “unethical, disturbing, and disgusting.” Yet on Jan. 15, the FDA sided with the scientists who have researched the issue, saying that meat and milk from cloned animals are “as safe to eat as food from conventionally bred animals.”0304 10

Now comes the real battle: Will consumers be able to tell which milk or meat on their supermarket shelves is from cloned animals or their offspring?

Industry Opposes Strict Laws

As part of its ruling, the FDA decided not to require labels. But several states are taking the opposite tack. At least 13 bills have been introduced in state legislatures across the country-including California, Tennessee, New Jersey, and Kentucky-that call for words or symbols alerting shoppers to the presence of cloned foods.

The language in all the bills is similar-and strong. For instance, the Kentucky House bill introduced on Jan. 28, by Representative Jim Glenn (D) says: “No person shall sell, offer or expose for sale, have in his possession for sale, or give away, for human consumption, any fresh or frozen meat, meat preparation, meat by-product, dairy food or dairy food product, or poultry or poultry product derived from a cloned animal or its offspring unless the product is clearly and conspicuously labeled as such.” In an interview, Glenn says: “Just like we know whether salmon is farm-raised or from the ocean, a consumer should know whether the meat is from a clone or not.”

These bills are strongly opposed by the biotech and livestock industry, which are pinning their hopes on the cloning technology to replicate the highest quality meat and milk in the industry for mass consumption. “The public will be completely alarmed with labels that say it’s cloned food, and no one will buy it,” says Donald Coover, a veterinarian from Galesburg, Kan., who conducts cloned-embryo transfers for farmers that raise cattle for meat and milk. He believes that labeling will kill the business before it starts.

GM Food Labels

Some food experts agree. “The problem with labeling is that it implies that something is wrong with the food,” says William Hallman, director of the Food Policy Institute at Rutgers University. “Just like a label warns of peanuts, a label on cloned foods will be interpreted as a warning.”

In fact, if past battles over genetically modified food are any indication, clone-labeling requirements may never see the light of day. After genetically modified food was given the green light by the federal government in 1992, at least 16 states introduced bills that called for labeling of such food. None of them became law. Only one bill in Vermont was passed; it required labeling, not of food but of seeds, to help farmers. And in 2005, Alaska passed legislation requiring labels for transgenic fish.

Still, consumer advocates are hopeful. They believe that unlike genetically engineered food, cloning is still a nascent technology that can be easily tracked. “State legislators are more willing to set the groundwork as the technology is introduced, rather than retroactively look at it when problems occur in the future,” says Joseph Mendelson, legal director at the Center for Food Safety in Washington.

Cloned Foods Pass Scientific Scrutiny

Scientific studies in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand have also declared cloned foods safe. However, none of their governments have approved cloned food yet. Given that all three mandate labeling of genetically modified food, the expectation is that any approval of clones would come with a similar labeling requirement.

But food advocacy groups and some politicians say labeling is essential so that consumers can avoid products they believe are unsafe or unethical. A nationwide poll conducted in 2007 by the Consumers Union found that 89% of Americans want cloned foods to be labeled and that 69% have concerns about food derived from clones and their offspring.

“I’m not saying that cloned food is dangerous, but if the American public doesn’t want to consume it on moral or religious grounds, they should have the choice,” says California Senator Carole Migden (D), who has reintroduced a bill that required labels on cloned food products. Last year, the bill was passed by both the California Senate and House, but was vetoed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (R). The governor said the bill would require tracking and labeling that could be “unworkable, costly, and unenforceable.”

Costly and Unenforceable

Indeed, for those reasons the state bills have a tough road ahead. The biggest problem is that there is no way of testing to know whether the animal is a clone. “Clones are identical to the animals they came from, and there’s no way to scientifically tell them apart,” says animal biotechnology specialist Alison Van Eenennaam at the University of California, Davis. “So such labeling is not enforceable.”

Besides, as Schwarzenegger pointed out, labeling would be costly, even if the cloned animals are tracked as promised by ViaGen, a biotech company that produces cloned cattle, pigs, and other animals in its labs. Each state that enacts such a law will have to develop two separate systems to transport milk and meat, one from regular animals and one from clones. Already, a similar process is in place in the organic food industry, where the two streams of production do not mix. In fact, many experts suggest that consumers who want to avoid eating food from cloned animals can just buy organic food. Under Agriculture Dept. requirements, organic foods must be grown or raised under specific conditions, which would disqualify cloned animals. “The organic industry has already said that they won’t have clones in their food stream, and they have ruled that they won’t allow cloned animals to enter their food chain,” says Van Eenennaam.

Food companies are extremely sensitive to the debate. Several of them, including retail chain Whole Foods Market (WFMI), milk producer Dean Foods (DF), and ice-cream maker Ben & Jerry’s (UN), have said they won’t accept products from cloned animals. But if food from clones isn’t labeled, companies may find it difficult to live up to that pledge. Besides, most food manufacturers and retailers are part of industry trade groups like the Food Marketing Institute or the Grocery Manufacturers Assn., which resist labeling mandates. The biotech and meat industries also will fight these bills aggressively.

Federal Labeling Bill

Of course, new state laws won’t be needed if federal lawmakers decide to revive the Cloned Food Labeling Act that is languishing in the Senate. Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) recently went to the Senate floor and in an impassioned speech urged her colleagues to pass the bill, which she originally introduced in January, 2007. The act would require the FDA and the Agriculture Dept. to mandate that all food that comes from cloned animals carry the following wording: “This product is from a cloned animal or its progeny.”

Senator Mikulski says: “Labeling does two things. It gives consumers the right to know and allows scientists to monitor.”

Gogoi is a contributing writer for BusinessWeek.com.

Mad Cow updates

Too little testing for mad cow, critics say

Recall renews mad cow worry


  Download story podcast

04:29 PM PDT on Thursday, March 13, 2008
By DOUGLAS QUAN
The Press-Enterprise

Preventing mad cow disease.

Special Section: More Beef Recall coverage

After the country's first mad cow case was found in 2003, the federal government ramped up testing cattle for the fatal disease.

But in 2006, officials scaled it back by 90 percent, citing the "extremely low" incidence of the disease in the United States.

Today, about 40,000 -- or 0.1 percent -- of the 37 million cows slaughtered each year are tested, a number that consumer groups say is too low, especially when compared to testing programs in other countries.

"Don't look, don't find" might be a more apt way